Daily Archives: January 18, 2011

Just a quick note for those folks who were wondering about Final Fantasy Type-0, which I talked about for a short bit a few weeks ago.

Siliconera reports that Final Fantasy Type-0 isn’t actually a new game, but rather, Final Fantasy Agito XIII sporting a new name. According to the report, Type-0 is set to become a spinoff of the Final Fantasy universe and will not be a part of the Final Fantasy XIII continuity anymore, seeing as there’s actually Final Fantasy Versus XIII and Final Fantasy XIII-2 to think about.

Final Fantasy Type-0 will be coming out in Japan this summer, and will span two UMD discs in length.


Due for release this year on the PS3 and Xbox 360.

This seems like a good incentive to finish FFXIII to me. Of course, if you hated the Final Fantasy XIII, you’d have reason to skip the sequel entirely.

What did you think of Final Fantasy XIII? Let me know in the comments, so I can debate the merits of Leona Lewis’ voice. :D

News comes from 4gamer.net via Destructoid.

 

EDIT: Siliconera has an update on this. According to what appears to be 4gamer.net’s Twitter account, a trailer for FFXIII-2 will be made available on January 20.


Breaking news folks.

Destructoid has just reported that the PS3 version of Valve’s upcoming game Portal 2 will allow players to not only play with PC and Mac gamers via Steam functionality (a first!), but also to play on the PC or Mac as well.

According to Valve, anyone who purchases Portal 2 for the PS3 will also get a free Steam play copy of Portal 2, which will work on the PC or Mac.

Feel free to check Destructoid for more details, and save up some cash for the PS3 version, why dontcha?


Category: PC Gaming, Portal

Over on Pid’s blog, The Meat Shield, is an intriguing question that touches on a lot of points that I’d think would be quite wonderful to discuss in a rational and civil manner. I shall attempt to do so, but will most probably devolve into spouting nonsense close to the end of this write-up. You have been warned.

Pid asks,

As a mature gamer (take that for whatever it is worth) would you be willing to spend a little extra cash on subscriptions to have access to a VIP server? Not to be elitist, but rather to get away from all the tots and twits for that matter! I imagine there would be some legal ramifications, but if you could get that ironed out, would it be worth it?

There are a couple of angles to look at his multi-part question as a whole, so let’s try tackling those angles, shall we?

1. The Nature of the Server

By this, I would have to ask, what constitutes a VIP server? Does paying a little extra allow folks added perks and whatnot, or does it simply raise another one of those hypothetical barriers to entry that I keep thinking about?

If there are no added features other than the ability to weed out people with less money, then I doubt it’d be a lucrative option for a company to take up. If there are substantial perks to maintaining a higher cost subscription, then it might be interesting to some people, but not if it goes over their allotted spending limit for gaming. I mean, one can simply turn off Barrens Chat (or its equivalent) by switching to a different channel or minimizing their Chat windows altogether, so why pay to get away from all the tots and twits?

2. Perceived Elitism

One issue that may arise from having a VIP server will be the stigma behind the denizens of that VIP server. To take a sci-fi analogy, imagine a VIP server as a seeming floating utopia that people who live on the land will think is either the promised land or an airborne Sodom and Gomorrah. People from the non-VIP servers may dislike a VIP player on the basis of perceived elitism, and vice-versa.

The most probable truth will be that a VIP server may weed out people who can’t afford the cost of VIP, and not exactly maintain an atmosphere of civility and grace that a utopia would presumably offer, since people are always prone to starting shit, for lack of a better term. In a nutshell, a VIP server will simply cause people to dislike other people based not only on differing personalities but also due to creating a “haves versus have-nots” situation, whatever that may imply to gamers.

3. The Victor Stillwater Angle

Victor Stillwater + ANY GAME = Instant Awesome.

Me not being able to afford VIP status = not awesome.

My blogger backlash = the spreading of outrage over my inability to play VIP = The downfall of VIP servers.

Solution: Give me free games and unlimited access.

While this is obviously a gross overestimation of my ability to influence the public and my ability to make things awesome, there is still a significant, vocal community out there that will condemn the very idea of a VIP server based on it being either an attempt to gouge consumers out of more money or for forcing some kind of segregation in the community.

I imagine this will lead to a lot of comparisons to Nazi Germany (Godwin’s Law), eventually leading to a “Rosa Parks situation” wherein someone who cannot afford to join the VIP server will join the VIP server anyway and never pay for the sub, thus getting arrested and shot by Spanish conquistadors in an open field.

That said, it might be interesting to have a VIP server, but I have doubts as to whether or not it will take off. At the very least, I find it impossible that they will allow for talking about Rule 34 on a VIP server, which would be a big step in stemming the tide of porn in the world.

 

EDIT: Stargrace notes in the comments below that Everquest actually had a VIP server back in the day, which means this isn’t a hypothetical anymore. In addition, Zubon pointed out that this has been a long-standing question, and his post back in 2007 reflects that. Take a look. :)


Category: MMOs, opinion

Advertising


Follow Games and Geekery

http://www.gamesandgeekery.com/feed/ http://twitter.com/vbarreirojr

Categories


Enchantment? Enchantment!